It’s a massive
work, a saga that goes on forever, but I can’t say I’m sorry to have listened
to it. There’s something grand about a
work that spans someone’s life, from her girlhood to her death (while in her
50s, maybe?). I enjoyed being immersed
in the medieval time period, even if the author’s depiction might not be precisely
how it was. Despite so much tragedy, the vastness of the novel(s) made the
tragedies seem merely a drop in a wooden bucket—sort of like how my troubles
seem miniscule when I visit the ocean and realize how insignificant I am (in a
good way). There’s something oddly satisfying about that massiveness—and the
fact that the story just meandered on and on and on, like you were witnessing Kristin’s
very-realistic life.
Certain
unnamed author-friends of mine might have a conniption about the lack of a
story arc.
And some story
elements were so sad that I wondered if the author had a mission to depict
medieval life as brutish and hellish. When the plague came through, nobody,
once afflicted, seemed to survive—but that’s just not accurate. Some people did survive. And while I appreciate stories that don’t
have their characters engaging in all sorts of illicit, bawdy sex that would
have generated serious consequences, Undset’s medieval society was as prim as
Victorian society in the extreme—a concept which it seems should have fallen
apart when presented in conjunction with her more relaxed attitude about
nudity.
I’m curious how
off she is on this. I rather think it’s a tendency so many have to kind of make
that assumption that society is more uptight and prim the further we go back in
history. After all, as we go back in our own minds through the more-strict
1950s and such, on back into the Victorian times, sexual mores become stricter
and more severe. It’s natural to assume that they must grow even more severe as
we continue to go back! But in
researching for my own novels, I’ve grown to understand that at least the 17th
and 18th centuries were more lax than Victorian times—and while I
know less about medieval society, I’ve thought it to be less uptight then, as
well. Undset was a product of Victorian
times, however, and she has a point that Kristin would have worn wimples and
veils. This reminds us of Muslim societies, which have a tendency to be quite conservative. So perhaps I’m left more uncertain than I was
before—even about the clothing. Wimples and veils but more relaxed nudity? I’m just unsure.
This saga took
an eternity to finish, but it feels like an accomplishment
to finally get to the end. The protagonist, Kristin Lavransdatter, was
generally cold and stand-offish, not emotional enough for my preferences, but
then she was Scandinavian, as is the author, and reminded me of my blond,
reserved mother quite a bit. So even as I was impatient with K.L., I resonated
with her reserve, and it struck a deep chord of familiarity. Perhaps one of my
favorite elements of the book is the author’s ability to present somewhat
narrow-minded perspectives while still holding our respect for the
characters—she includes a few tedious religious discussions, but those serve to
remind us that the characters were not being flippant with their
narrow-mindedness. They just hadn’t yet challenged other elements of their
world view—and wouldn’t, of course. While I don’t believe we should assume that
people can’t be open-minded, regardless of time period, obviously most aren’t,
and the author’s purpose is valid. To be so invested in your protagonist and
restrict yourself with blinders you’ve determined are in place is quite a
feat—and I admire the world she’s constructed for us. I do feel more in touch
with medieval Scandinavia than I ever have
before, thanks to Sigrid Undset.
No comments:
Post a Comment